What F1 Drivers Really Think Of The New Halo Concept 'Thong'

So you may well have seen the F1 cockpit protection device that Kimi Raikkonen debuted on the penultimate day of pre-season testing. Yeah, it looks like a thong or a flip-flop, but it is the āpreferredā option of the FIA when it comes to improving the safety of the sport.
F1ās governing body said it āintends to introduce cockpit protection for 2017ā and the first prototype was trialled by Raikkonen and Ferrari team-mate Sebastian Vettel on the final two days of F1 testing in Spain.
As well as there being mixed reactions from fans, the same can also be said for the drivers. Some strong opinions have been voiced to media at the test track about the āhaloā prototype, with Lewis Hamilton and Nico Hulkenberg disapproving of it and others, like Nico Rosberg and Sebastian Vettel, being for the deviceās introduction.
Hamilton said:
āPlease no! This is the worst looking mod in Formula 1 history. I appreciate the quest for safety but this is Formula 1, and the way it is now is perfectly fine. If it does come in then l hope that we will be given the option of not using it because l will not be using it on my car.ā
Hulkenberg also isnāt a fan:
āDonāt do it. It sends the wrong message. F1 is very safe at the moment. It looks horrible, I donāt like it and itās just one of these little personal things that I wouldnāt like to see it.
āYou canāt sterilise the sport. There needs to be an element of danger - I think in a way thatās sexy and attractive and itās also what Formula 1 needs. Safety standards in F1 are pretty high and very good, Iād be happy to accept those risks and keep running as we are.ā
FIRST LOOK: @ScuderiaFerrari have applied the new cockpit protection halo to Kimi Raikkonen's car this morning pic.twitter.com/B0vNWeFZcq
ā Formula 1 (@F1) March 3, 2016
Vettel believes it is crucial something like the āhaloā is implemented:
āWell I think first of all to go around is OK. You can see what you need to see. I think we can improve the system in terms of aesthetics and also in terms of how much visibly is in your way. Tested as well in the simulator and I think we will see probably evolutions of it very soon.
āIn principle, I agree it doesnāt look very nice. Itās not the picture youāre used to from Formula 1 for a long time, but equally it helps increasing the safety and helps saving lives. There would be at least two drivers in the last four years that I remember that would still be around ā Henry Surtees and Justin Wilson ā if we had this type of system. I think it can be as ugly as possible. I think nothing justifies not having these guys around anymore.ā
Ricciardo reacted to Hulkenbergās comments:
āI heard Hulkenberg say some things I donāt agree with, because thereās no need to be a hero about the situation. It doesnāt change the sport, or the speed of the car ā itās just if there are any flying objects, itās an extra bit of protection for us.
āI donāt know why heās puffing his chest out for something like that, it doesnāt make sense. The cars from 2008 to 2009 had a big change, the cars were ugly. The halo isnāt as dramatic as that.ā
Ferrari Testing the Halo design today #F1 #barcelonatest2 #F1Testing #halo #halodevice pic.twitter.com/5wMMlmJd4c
ā Valmar Viisel (@paddocknews) March 3, 2016
Felipe Massa, who suffered head injuries when his helmet was struck by debris in 2009, added:
āSafety is the most important thing and I totally agree with the halo or the closed cockpits or whatever - I agree with this change. But it doesnāt look very nice. Weāll see how itās going to be. If itās good for the safety, itās fine.ā
Rosberg shared his thoughts on social media:
Itās definitely nice to see drivers sharing their honest thoughts. What do you think about it? Who do you agree with? Let us know in the comments.
Comments
As a viewer, Iām on the side of āThe risks are a part of the sportā. I can certainly see that the drivers would want to be as safe as possible though, just as I do in a road car. Either way I agree with the people who say they should work on integrating the design into the car. This looks like it was a second thought. This is the 2016 car though, so in this design it was. I am sure it will look better in 2017, and I have no doubt it could be made to look good if they spend time on it.
Why not something like this lolā¦
well⦠ehm..
Hmm, strange, I thought vettel wouldāve said āobviouslyā after every goddamn sentence, as he does in every single interview. Guess this is some spokesman from vettelā¦
On this occasion I am 100% with Hamiltonās opinion
If its meant to stop things hitting their face, its not going to be very useful, theirs the one bar right in-front of there face which is what, 1/2 cm wide? What if it comes slightly from the side?
Keep the top bar and add curved glass.
F1 (flip flop 1)
Will a strong bar on top and bulletproof glass wrap around under it works?
I swear, the F1 Safety Regulators are the Overprotective Parents of racingā¦
They are also making the drivers look like this in car form.
http://www.legacydad.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/overprotective-parents.jpg
Just terrible⦠It looks terrible, I see a lot of unprotected area for debris and it just looks ill conceived. F1 is dead, Iāll stick with BTCC.
Pagination