What F1 Drivers Really Think Of The New Halo Concept 'Thong'

So you may well have seen the F1 cockpit protection device that Kimi Raikkonen debuted on the penultimate day of pre-season testing. Yeah, it looks like a thong or a flip-flop, but it is the âpreferredâ option of the FIA when it comes to improving the safety of the sport.
F1âs governing body said it âintends to introduce cockpit protection for 2017â and the first prototype was trialled by Raikkonen and Ferrari team-mate Sebastian Vettel on the final two days of F1 testing in Spain.
As well as there being mixed reactions from fans, the same can also be said for the drivers. Some strong opinions have been voiced to media at the test track about the âhaloâ prototype, with Lewis Hamilton and Nico Hulkenberg disapproving of it and others, like Nico Rosberg and Sebastian Vettel, being for the deviceâs introduction.
Hamilton said:
âPlease no! This is the worst looking mod in Formula 1 history. I appreciate the quest for safety but this is Formula 1, and the way it is now is perfectly fine. If it does come in then l hope that we will be given the option of not using it because l will not be using it on my car.â
Hulkenberg also isnât a fan:
âDonât do it. It sends the wrong message. F1 is very safe at the moment. It looks horrible, I donât like it and itâs just one of these little personal things that I wouldnât like to see it.
âYou canât sterilise the sport. There needs to be an element of danger - I think in a way thatâs sexy and attractive and itâs also what Formula 1 needs. Safety standards in F1 are pretty high and very good, Iâd be happy to accept those risks and keep running as we are.â
FIRST LOOK: @ScuderiaFerrari have applied the new cockpit protection halo to Kimi Raikkonen's car this morning pic.twitter.com/B0vNWeFZcq
â Formula 1 (@F1) March 3, 2016
Vettel believes it is crucial something like the âhaloâ is implemented:
âWell I think first of all to go around is OK. You can see what you need to see. I think we can improve the system in terms of aesthetics and also in terms of how much visibly is in your way. Tested as well in the simulator and I think we will see probably evolutions of it very soon.
âIn principle, I agree it doesnât look very nice. Itâs not the picture youâre used to from Formula 1 for a long time, but equally it helps increasing the safety and helps saving lives. There would be at least two drivers in the last four years that I remember that would still be around â Henry Surtees and Justin Wilson â if we had this type of system. I think it can be as ugly as possible. I think nothing justifies not having these guys around anymore.â
Ricciardo reacted to Hulkenbergâs comments:
âI heard Hulkenberg say some things I donât agree with, because thereâs no need to be a hero about the situation. It doesnât change the sport, or the speed of the car â itâs just if there are any flying objects, itâs an extra bit of protection for us.
âI donât know why heâs puffing his chest out for something like that, it doesnât make sense. The cars from 2008 to 2009 had a big change, the cars were ugly. The halo isnât as dramatic as that.â
Ferrari Testing the Halo design today #F1 #barcelonatest2 #F1Testing #halo #halodevice pic.twitter.com/5wMMlmJd4c
â Valmar Viisel (@paddocknews) March 3, 2016
Felipe Massa, who suffered head injuries when his helmet was struck by debris in 2009, added:
âSafety is the most important thing and I totally agree with the halo or the closed cockpits or whatever - I agree with this change. But it doesnât look very nice. Weâll see how itâs going to be. If itâs good for the safety, itâs fine.â
Rosberg shared his thoughts on social media:
Itâs definitely nice to see drivers sharing their honest thoughts. What do you think about it? Who do you agree with? Let us know in the comments.
Comments
Well, guess what, itâs called extreme sports. Like it or not, there are always lives at risk. If you donât agree with that, go play chess or golf. Strongly dissagree with this innovation.
Why donât they just use a plexi visor with an open top
Why not use a fighter plane like windshield in front of the driver, while keeping the space directly above his head free.
That way the car provides protection from flying objects, and still allows for easy escapes when the car is overturned. I think itâd be a good compromise
Something like thisâŠ
i miss the good olâ days of when danger was part of the sport, now its just the same person winning every time and the same thing every lap. Why canât we just overthrow the FIA and make it a real sport again.
This is just silly, I mean sure it works. But why introduce it? F1 is extremely safe now a days, of course you canât eliminate or mitigate all risks. If this is for Bianchiâs accident, it wasnât the cars fault, it was the race control and safety team fault.
I understand FIAs concern, but IMO there are better and less intrusive ways to protect the driver from flying objects.
They should just make like a whole roof thing instead of putting a freaking sandal on a car.
Am I the only one who agrees with Vettel? Itâs not really nice as it looks now, but Iâm sure they are going to improve it through time. You can call F1 an âextremeâ sport, but itâs 2016 now, and I donât think people should die in sports.
I donât either like or dislike it. But having a damned iron thing in your face reduces the vision angle so much that you will need that to save you.
sure block more visability
that could not stop a sodding rice pudding!!!!
its crap this is like nuetering a prize breeding dog no need
Pagination