F1's Stupid New Qualifying Format Can't Even Be Implemented Yet
Remember the silly new qualifying format that was recently confirmed for the F1 2016 season? Well, it wonât be used in Australia. Or the following three races, for that matter.
F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone says the new system has been delayed to the Spanish Grand Prix, round five, as the new format wonât be ready in time for the new season.
With the rule being announced and decided so close to the first round, there simply wasnât enough time to sort the software and system out. Which begs the question, why say yes to it for 2016 anyway?
Timing is the responsibility of Formula One Management (FOM) and not the FIA, but while the rule may have been discussed for a while, confirmation only came very recently.
Ecclestone told The Independent:
âThe new qualifying wonât happen because we canât get everything together in time. It was going to come in at the start of this year but we are not going to be able to get all the software done in time.â
âSo the qualifying changes will probably be in Spain. In Australia, it will be the old qualifying. All of the software has to be written so itâs not easy.â
He even went on to say he doesnât like the new elimination-style format, where over the three sessions drivers gradually drop out of qualifying.
âItâs not what I wanted in the end. All Iâm trying to do is muddle up the grid so that the guy that is quickest in qualifying doesnât sit on pole and disappear because why should he be slow in the race if he is quick in qualifying?â
Yeah, not a great start for this bizarre new regulation and format. Surely it would have been better just to bring it in for 2017, as the current system is just fine.
Comments
I want to see all the cars running in qualyfing, and not one hot lap and âfk this st, Iâm outâ and go to the pits. But they must to plan something to donât put in a hurry to the teams as 1 or 2 more engines for car at the season and 1 o 2 more tyre sets per weekend
Software wonât be done in time? Seriously who do they employ as software developers, Bernie?
they employ the CT ios app developers.
Software developer here⊠if it sounds simple, it most likely isnât. Only very rarely something that seems âsimpleâ or âjust <insert small feature here>â is so. And Iâm not even talking about bugs, testing, team management and stupid s#%t that drives devs insane (which usually is worse the bigger the organization youâre working with/for).
I have a proposal⊠30 minutes and the best time counts, as many attempts as you dare. How difficult is this?
This would make the races even more boring as there would be no overtaking. Everyone would already be in optimum position for their cars.
Just watch Moto Gp instead 😉😉
am I the only one that think it is a good idea ? It would add some chaos and force the teams to drive more. It is pretty exciting
bullshit
F1 should not be about chaos, it should about fast cars! And the idea the the pole posistion is not occupied by the fastest car/driver in a circuit itâs everything that is wrong in f1⊠And the idea that the cars would make more laps with this concept is wrong! Weâll see the fastest make one great lap at the beginning of the first 2 sessions and then stay in box⊠With the number of sets of tire restricted no one does more laps than he needs
Guys who sit on pole will still sit on pole.
Let me guess, you like nascar and you like the new yellow flag system.
I have a proposal⊠dump this 3 session bullshit, and return to old format.
The old one had 3 sessions too.
This new F1 format is all the rage.
Why the hell bother with multiple session anyways? Give 60 minutes and best time counts.
The point is to get rid of the slower cars giving the faster cars more space on track to go even faster
muddle up the gridâŠwell why donât just make up the starting grid by random selection, no qualifying at all, thatâs good for cost saving too
Why not just postpone the qualifying